For most yes, but for large or esp. sensitive transactions, makes sense to be on L1 @dwr.eth

For most yes, but for large or esp. sensitive transactions, makes sense to be on L1

I think unusable in comparison. When you do everything on an L2 for pennies or even sponsored by a pay master, paying even $3 to use an L1 is going to seem absolutely absurd. @ccarella.eth

I think unusable in comparison. When you do everything on an L2 for pennies or even sponsored by a pay master, paying even $3 to use an L1 is going to seem absolutely absurd.

Will sharding address network fees? @salief

Will sharding address network fees?

it will but imo it feels like rollups will take over L1 block space even with sharding since a single user will never be able to compete with an entire rollup of users against network fees @neokry

it will but imo it feels like rollups will take over L1 block space even with sharding since a single user will never be able to compete with an entire rollup of users against network fees

will ethereum L1 be unusable for non rollup applications in the long term @neokry

will ethereum L1 be unusable for non rollup applications in the long term

Not to get too into details as this is not my expertise, but I was told that passing data between shards must be done asynchronously and each shard will feel like a separate chain. If that's the case then yes dealing with the overhead will not be worth it @hydrogen

Not to get too into details as this is not my expertise, but I was told that passing data between shards must be done asynchronously and each shard will feel like a separate chain. If that's the case